Software Patents: NoSoftwarePatents.com Issues Call to Action in Europe

From  http://www.linuxbusinessweek.com/story/48872_f.htm

* redblack88 commented on 25 March 2005:
o If MySQL's Marten Mickos says this, that's good enough for me. Support NoSoftwarePatents.com!!


* Whats up commented on 25 March 2005:
o Why do some of your articles not allow feedback now? Trying to make it look better?

Your Write:

"SCO has finally gone and done something it should have done ages ago so the Groklaw hate-SCO site wouldn't have a monopoly on posting all the legal filings in the SCO cases."

Too bad they took the scans of the court documents from Groklaw and other sites without permission and used them instead of obtaining there own. Now we know for sure that SCO has no respect for IP.


* 2803 commented on 28 March 2005:
o Probably because our feedback is correct unlike MOG's fiction.

As far as this article goes...she forgot to write that her bosses will be there lobbying for software patents...M$ and SCOXE.


* cat_herder_5263 commented on 28 March 2005:
o Whats up commented on 25 March 2005: Too bad they took the scans of the court documents from Groklaw and other sites without permission and used them instead of obtaining there own.

I'm not so sure about that. Those of us who follow the zany antics of that wacky Group from Lindon, UT on the Yahoo! message board noticed a GREAT FLURRY OF ACTIVITY on PACER on the Ides of March. Someone got virtually every court document in SCO v IBM on that day.

However, some Bitter Groklaw Exiles and Fawning Groklaw Toadies have accused the SCO Group of downloading SOME documents from Groklaw, to wit, those Frank Sorenson picked up from the court house, scanned and converted to PDF.

However they were obtained, those court documents are in the public domain and noone can exert control over their distribution.

=^^=


* JustMe commented on 28 March 2005:
o Feedback continues to be removed for some reason.

Why offer a feedback option if you're going to remove the feedback?